To kill or capture? To publish the death shots or not to publish? Jeepers. I even hear it took the supposed leader of the free world 17 hours to decide if he even wanted them to go in at all!
But now that the deed is done, I've been hard pressed to find an opinion on the whole brouhaha that sounds right to me. Until now.
It started last night, when I heard one of the administration apparatchiks detailing the information that was being gathered from the site, and the various agencies sifting through it, and how much of the information was useful, etc. I though to myself, if I was in charge, I'd probably want to keep the enemy guessing about whether I got anything useful, and how much of it there was. Make them have to scramble and worry.
This morning though, that instinct went one step further when as a rare treat I heard Oliver North on my daily morning show, opining that the best approach would have been to keep the whole business under wraps. And he's right.
Keeping the enemy in the dark that their leader is dead, even holing up in his safe house for a few days, to gather more information from live sources (possibly) would have been a much better strategy.
Unfortunately, that is not how Obama and his pep squad roll. Oliver North was right about that too...this president is all about the victory laps.
Whole interview here...
11_0506_oliver_north